Request a Consultation

Funnel Waterfall Audit

Funnel waterfall audit helps you see where revenue is being lost inside your funnel, not just that “conversion is down.”

Most leadership teams can see top-line metrics:

  • traffic is up or down

  • leads are up or down

  • pipeline feels slow

  • revenue is unpredictable

What they can’t see quickly is the real constraint:
Where is the system leaking?

This tool makes the leak visible by turning your funnel into a revenue waterfall and comparing each stage against high-performance benchmarks.

You enter your monthly actuals, and the audit shows:

  • which stage is the biggest constraint

  • how much revenue is left on the table

  • what type of fix is likely required

Funnel Waterfall Audit

Funnel Data

Benchmarks: Leads (3%), Calls (15%), Deals (25%).

Target: 3%
Target: 15%
Target: 25%

The Revenue Waterfall

TRAFFIC
100% Volume
LEADS
0%
LEAK
CALLS
0%
LEAK
REVENUE
0%
LEAK

System Check

Analyzing...
Total Revenue $0
Loading...

What the Funnel Waterfall Audit Does

The funnel waterfall audit shows funnel performance as a sequence of stages and highlights the conversion gap at each stage.

Instead of guessing where to fix, you get answers to practical leadership questions:

  • Are we losing revenue at the top, middle, or bottom of the funnel?

  • Is this an offer issue, a trust issue, or a sales execution issue?

  • If we hit benchmark rates, what is the revenue upside?

  • Which improvement would create the biggest impact first?

This is not a dashboard. It’s an audit tool designed to create clarity and prioritisation.

 


Who This Tool Is For

The funnel waterfall audit is built for:

  • founders and CEOs who want predictable revenue

  • CMOs who want to improve conversion before buying more traffic

  • sales leaders who want clearer pipeline quality

  • operators who need to remove constraints across teams

This tool is especially useful if:

  • lead volume increased but revenue didn’t

  • sales says leads are weak

  • marketing says sales follow-up is slow

  • pipeline feels inconsistent month to month

  • you’re scaling spend and CAC is rising

 


How the Funnel Waterfall Audit Works

The tool asks for your monthly funnel actuals:

  • traffic (visitors)

  • leads (opt-ins)

  • calls booked

  • deals closed

  • average deal value

It calculates your actual conversion rates between stages:

  • traffic to lead

  • lead to call

  • call to deal

Then it compares those rates against benchmark targets and estimates the revenue gap at each stage.

The key output is:

  • the constraint stage

  • the “left on table” revenue estimate

  • a simple diagnostic of what kind of fix you likely need

The point is speed. Leaders need the signal before they build a solution.

 


What Each Stage Means (And What Usually Breaks)

A funnel is not a diagram. It is a system with constraints.

Stage 1: Traffic (Visitors)

Traffic is the volume entering the system.

Common issues at this stage:

  • traffic is low quality

  • channels are misaligned with the offer

  • messaging attracts the wrong buyer intent

If traffic is mismatched, you can’t “sales” your way out of it.

 

Stage 2: Leads (Opt-ins)

Leads represent conversion from attention to interest.

Common causes of leaks:

  • unclear offer

  • weak positioning

  • too much friction

  • low trust proof

If leads are low relative to traffic, the constraint is often offer clarity.

 

Stage 3: Calls (Booked)

Calls represent intent and trust.

Common causes of leaks:

  • weak nurture sequence

  • slow speed-to-lead

  • unclear qualification

  • wrong CTA for the stage

If leads are coming in but calls are not, the constraint is usually trust and follow-up systems.

 

Stage 4: Deals Closed (Revenue)

Deals represent conversion from intent to commitment.

Common causes of leaks:

  • poor discovery structure

  • weak differentiation and proof

  • pricing misalignment

  • inconsistent sales process

If calls exist but deals are low, the constraint is often sales execution or offer-market fit at the deal level.

 


How to Use the Funnel Waterfall Audit (Step-by-Step)

Step 1: Enter your monthly actuals
Use a 30–90 day average, not your best month.

Step 2: Confirm the shape of the waterfall
Look for the stage where drop-off is most pronounced.

Step 3: Check the constraint headline
The audit labels the most likely constraint:

  • top of funnel (offer)

  • middle of funnel (trust)

  • bottom of funnel (sales)

Step 4: Look at the “left on table” revenue
This helps leadership prioritise based on impact, not opinion.

Step 5: Pick one stage to fix first
Fix the biggest constraint before adding volume.

 


How to Interpret the Results (Constraint Logic)

A strong funnel waterfall audit doesn’t just report conversion rates. It helps you interpret what the system is telling you.

Use this simple interpretation:

If the leak is at traffic to lead

This often indicates:

  • positioning is unclear

  • offer is not specific

  • landing page structure is weak

  • traffic source is misaligned

Primary fix type:
Offer and messaging architecture.

 

If the leak is at lead to call

This often indicates:

  • trust is not built

  • follow-up is slow or inconsistent

  • nurture is missing

  • qualification is unclear

Primary fix type:
Nurture and speed-to-lead systems.

 

If the leak is at call to deal

This often indicates:

  • sales process inconsistency

  • weak discovery and objection handling

  • pricing misalignment

  • poor differentiation and proof

Primary fix type:
Sales execution and deal conversion systems.

A useful rule:
Don’t buy more traffic until you know which stage is the constraint.

 


Common Mistakes When Auditing Funnels

Mistake 1: Comparing funnels without context

Benchmarks are directional. Your business model and deal cycle matter.

Use the output as a prioritisation signal, not a judgment.

 

Mistake 2: Fixing the wrong stage

Teams often default to top-of-funnel improvements because they are visible.

Constraints are often in nurture or sales execution.

 

Mistake 3: Using bad baseline data

If your inputs are inconsistent, your conclusions will be too.

Use a monthly average.

 

Mistake 4: Treating “leads” as a success metric

Leads are not success.
Revenue is success.

If lead volume rises but deals don’t, the system is leaking.

 

Mistake 5: Doing five fixes at once

If you change everything, you can’t learn what worked.

Pick one stage and fix it in a 2–4 week cycle.

 


Example Scenarios

Scenario 1: Lead volume up, deals flat (B2B)

Inputs show:

  • traffic stable

  • leads up

  • calls down

  • deals down

Audit interpretation:
Middle of funnel leak.

Likely cause:
Nurture and speed-to-lead.

Fix:

  • standardise follow-up SLA

  • build a simple nurture sequence

  • tighten qualification

  • strengthen proof assets

 

Scenario 2: Calls are high, close rate low (B2B)

Inputs show:

  • calls booked are healthy

  • deals closed are low

Audit interpretation:
Bottom of funnel leak.

Likely cause:
Sales structure.

Fix:

  • standardise discovery steps

  • define qualification criteria

  • improve objection handling

  • align offer to buyer outcomes

 


If This Sounds Like You (Diagnostic Checklist)

The funnel waterfall audit is a good fit if:

  • pipeline is unpredictable

  • marketing and sales disagree about “lead quality”

  • conversion rates swing month to month

  • you suspect a nurture gap

  • you are spending more but not closing more

  • your sales team is busy but revenue is flat

  • you don’t know which funnel stage is the constraint

 


How I Think About This (From Real Work)

Most funnel problems are not “marketing problems” or “sales problems.”

They are system problems.

What I typically see:

  • teams chase volume before fixing leaks

  • conversion is measured, but not interpreted

  • nurture is missing or inconsistent

  • sales process varies by rep

  • leaders lack one shared funnel model

What I prioritize:

  • quantify the leakage stage-by-stage

  • identify the constraint

  • fix one stage at a time

  • build measurement that supports decisions

  • install weekly review cadence so improvements hold

What good looks like:

  • stable conversion and predictable pipeline

  • fewer debates between marketing and sales

  • clear ownership per stage

  • the business grows without constant spend increases

error: