Real estate leads under $4, without pretending volume equals value.
Category
Residential real estate, B2C lead generation
Proven at
Under $4 cost per lead
Constraint
Meta Special Ad Category for housing
The real metric
Cost per contactable lead, not cost per lead
Starts with
A free 20 minute account review
Cheap leads are the easy part
Volume that never picks up
Special Ad Category removes your levers
Enquiries with no intent attached
Volume and quality, held together
- Form design that filters without killing volume
- Offer matched to intent stage
- Landing pages instead of instant forms where quality matters
- Geography and creative carry the targeting
- Broad delivery with strong signal to guide it
- No reliance on audiences that housing cannot use
- Contacted and appointment stage events
- Closed won as offline conversions
- Cost per contactable lead reported, not just CPL
B2C real estate, in numbers
Cost per lead
High volume
Special Ad Category
Accounts in portfolio
Answers before you book
Maybe, and I will not promise it. That figure came from a specific market, offer and lead definition. In a different city, at a different price point, with a tighter lead definition, the number moves. What travels is the method, not the benchmark.
Meta places housing ads in a restricted category that removes much of the detailed targeting available elsewhere and limits geographic radius. If you advertise property listings or housing services, it applies to you, and running outside it risks the account.
Both work, and they are different builds. Seller leads are usually more valuable and more expensive, buyer leads come cheaper and in far greater volume. The structure and the lead definition should reflect which one your business actually needs.
Sometimes, and sometimes it is a speed to lead problem inside the office. The way to find out is to send contact and appointment outcomes back to Meta and look at the difference. That is uncomfortable for both sides, which is why it rarely gets done.